
Burnout: Signs, Stages and How to Recover
What burnout is under ICD-11, the three dimensions described by Maslach, how it overlaps with depression, and what the evidence says actually helps.
A free, private burnout self-test and quiz: score yourself across the three dimensions — exhaustion, cynicism and reduced efficacy — see which profile you fit, and read how it applies at work and for students. Honest about what a self-assessment can and cannot do.
Updated: July 31, 2026 · 🔒 Your data never leaves your browser
Burnout is not one thing you either have or do not have. Research describes it along three axes, and the combination matters more than any single score: high exhaustion on its own usually means too much work, while high exhaustion together with high cynicism is the pattern that research calls burnout. This self-check shows you all three.
Answer for the past three months. 15 questions, about two minutes.
0 of 15 answered
Answer every question to see your result.
ℹ️ This is not a diagnosis
This questionnaire is our own and is not a validated instrument: it shows a profile across three dimensions, it does not measure burnout in any clinical sense. Burnout is not a diagnosis in DSM-5 or in ICD-11 — the latter lists it as a factor influencing health, not an illness.
⚕️ When to see a doctor
If low mood, loss of interest and lack of energy spill over into life outside work, persist beyond two weeks, and interfere with sleeping and eating — or if you have thoughts that life is not worth living — speak to a doctor or therapist. Burnout and depression look almost identical from the outside and are treated differently.
Burnout is not measured as a single quantity, and that is not a technicality — it changes what you should do about a high score.
Exhaustion is the energy dimension: nothing left at the end of the day, and rest that no longer restores. It is the symptom people recognise first and the one that responds fastest to a reduction in load.
Cynicism is the attitude dimension, sometimes called depersonalisation or disengagement: the work stops mattering, the people in it start to grate, you find yourself doing the minimum. It is the dimension that predicts whether someone leaves the job, and it responds poorly to rest.
Reduced efficacy is the competence dimension: the sense that you are handling things worse than you used to, that easy tasks have become slow, that finishing something brings nothing. It tends to move last and to recover last.
Leiter and Maslach's work on latent profiles makes a point that a single burnout score erases: people distribute across distinct patterns, and the patterns have different causes.
| Pattern | What it usually indicates | What tends to help |
|---|---|---|
| Exhaustion high, cynicism low | Volume: too much work, too little recovery | Reducing load, protecting recovery time |
| Cynicism high, exhaustion moderate | Content: unfairness, lost control, values clash | Changing the conditions; rest does little |
| Both high | The burnout pattern proper | Structural change; time off buys weeks, not a solution |
| All three high | Overlaps heavily with depression | Professional assessment |
This is why the self-check reports three numbers rather than one verdict. Someone exhausted but still engaged has a different problem from someone who has plenty of energy and no longer cares, even if a single combined score would place them at the same point.
Maslach and Leiter's model locates the cause not in the person but in the fit between the person and the job, across six areas: workload, control, reward, community, fairness and values. Burnout tends to follow a sustained mismatch in one or more of them.
The practical use of this list is diagnostic. If your cynicism score is the high one, run down the six and ask which is worst. In most cases people can name it immediately — and it is usually fairness or control, not workload.
Читайте также: Burnout: Signs, Stages and How to Recover
The three-dimension model was built for work, but researchers adapted it to education years ago. The student version measures the same axes in academic terms: exhaustion from coursework and deadlines, cynicism toward your studies, and a reduced sense of academic efficacy. Validated student-specific scales exist — the MBI–Student Survey and the School Burnout Inventory — and academic burnout predicts dropping out much as workplace burnout predicts quitting.
So yes, you can take this test as a student: read every mention of "work" as "your studies". The three scores still separate the volume problem — too many deadlines at once — from the structural one, a course that no longer feels meaningful. What it will not give you is a norm calibrated on students: the cut-offs here are thirds of the range, not thresholds from a student sample. And if the exhaustion has spread into your sleep, mood and life outside studying, treat that as a reason to contact your university's health service, not a score to lower.
It is not the Maslach Burnout Inventory, which is a licensed instrument with published norms; those items are copyrighted and are not reproduced here. It is not validated against any sample, so its cut-offs describe thirds of the possible range rather than clinical thresholds. And it cannot distinguish burnout from depression, which is the single most consequential thing anyone would want a burnout test to do.
It is also not a diagnosis, because there is no diagnosis to give. Burnout does not appear in DSM-5, and in ICD-11 it sits in the chapter of factors influencing health status rather than among the disorders. That is not a loophole in the classifications — it reflects a genuine unresolved question about whether burnout is a distinct condition or a work-flavoured description of something we already have names for.
Читайте также: Is Burnout in the DSM-5? The Short Answer and What It Changes
Stop scoring and speak to a clinician if low mood, loss of interest and lack of energy have spread beyond work into the rest of your life, have lasted more than two weeks, or are interfering with sleeping and eating — and immediately if you have thoughts that life is not worth living.
Those are depression screening criteria, not burnout ones, and the distinction matters because the treatments differ. A questionnaire on a website cannot make that call, and the cost of getting it wrong is asymmetric: treating depression as burnout delays care that works.
No. DSM-5 and DSM-5-TR contain no burnout diagnosis, and no proposal to add one has been accepted. The closest formal recognition is in ICD-11, where burnout appears in the chapter on factors influencing health status — reasons people contact health services that are explicitly not classified as illnesses. So a clinician cannot diagnose you with burnout in the way they could diagnose depression.
No. The MBI is copyrighted and licensed commercially, so its items cannot be reproduced here. What this self-check borrows is the three-dimensional structure of the construct — exhaustion, cynicism, reduced efficacy — which is described openly in the published literature. The questions are our own, the scale is not validated, and the cut-offs at 7 and 14 are thirds of the range rather than norms from a sample.
Definitionally, burnout is tied to work and tends to lift with sustained distance from the job, while depression touches every area of life. In practice the symptoms overlap heavily — a review of 92 studies concluded the boundary between them is conceptually fragile. This is exactly why a self-test cannot settle it: telling them apart is clinical work.
Start by looking at which dimension is highest, because they point at different problems. High exhaustion with intact engagement usually means volume, and reducing load still works. High cynicism usually means something structural — unfairness, lost control, values mismatch — and rest barely touches it. A 2017 meta-analysis found that organisation-directed interventions were roughly twice as effective as ones aimed at the individual.
It reliably lowers exhaustion, and the effect reliably fades within a few weeks of returning if nothing about the job has changed. Treat time off as relief that buys you room to change something, not as the change itself.
Yes. Academic burnout is a well-studied version of the same three-dimension pattern, with its own validated scales — the MBI–Student Survey and the School Burnout Inventory. The formal ICD-11 term is reserved for the occupational context, so a clinician would not label it 'burnout' in exactly the same way, but the framework and the experience carry over: read each mention of 'work' as 'your studies'. See the section above on taking this test as a student.
Exhaustion from caregiving is real and worth attention, and researchers describe a parallel 'parental burnout' with its own exhaustion and detachment dimensions. But the ICD-11 burnout definition covers the occupational context only, and this questionnaire is written around work and study demands, so it will measure caregiving strain less well than a scale built for it.

What burnout is under ICD-11, the three dimensions described by Maslach, how it overlaps with depression, and what the evidence says actually helps.
Academic burnout is the three-dimension pattern applied to study: exhaustion, cynicism and a drop in academic efficacy. Its symptoms, why students burn out, and what the evidence says helps.

What acute and chronic stress do to the body, which coping techniques hold up in systematic reviews, what is oversold, and when to seek professional help.